Seattle Community

Dex_phoenix
Greatly helpful
8.0
out of 10
11 votes

Prospecting 2.0

Web 2.0 is a shift in the way businesses think and leverage the Internet. Sales 2.0 is a shift in the way that business manage their sales forces and leads. But is there a Prospecting 2.0?
Written Sep 03, 2008, read 3053 times since then.
Closed_info

 

Not too long ago (say 1990) if we wanted to drive leads for our business we would send out postcards. Really great looking postcards. We would send out thousands of them, hoping for a 1% response rate. Online postcard companies that would send the postcards out for you automated this process. These companies would even provide the mailing list. Over the years, these organizations morphed into email houses and other eMarketing shops.

Prospecting 1.0 moved us onto the “internet superhighway” with online seminars (webinars). No longer limited to an in-person seminar in multiple local cities (can anyone else say 10 city seminars in 4 weeks?) the Internet allowed us to produce an online version of our in-person seminar. These of course became so dry that we supplemented the rather poor attendance with recordings that became available ‘on demand’. Prospective 1.0 eventually led to Podcasts and who (other than me) doesn’t want to listen to selling training materials on their iPod?

Web 2.0 has created a more open approach to the Internet, in particular user-generated content, blogs, podcasts, social media, review sites, Wikipedia, etc. Prospecting 1.0 has clearly benefitting from Web 2.0 trends as companies are using the social networks to drive business (certainly the recruiting industry and consultants are benefitting from social networks). Sales 2.0 brought together discrete marketing and sales tools into a single framework (think Salesforce.com, WebEx and Genius) and thus the Sales 2.0 sales force leverages the activity from Web 2.0 venues (such as Blogs) to deliver leads to the sales team. Web 2.0 was a real paradigm shift as consumer-oriented venues (Facebook for instance) are being leveraged for businesses. Companies started thinking about their social media coverage the same way they measure their public relations (print) coverage. But there has not been a shift in the way that prospecting occurs – it is very much the same formula; response to lead to qualified lead to warm lead to hot lead to opportunity to hot opportunity to deal. Many people have written about these steps (from Miller Heimen to Siebel) but let’s assume these are pretty much the steps. Web 2.0 has given more ways for responses to occur – from clicks, to blog posts, to downloads and web responses. These build on the direct mail response leads from the early 90s but in the end are still just responses. Shouldn’t the Internet be able to shift the way that people prospect for business the same way the recruiters now fish for candidates across LinkedIn?

Prospecting 2.0 is the new trend in allowing buyers to reach decision makers without the need for the first 3 steps of the marketing equation (response – lead – qualified lead). This is actually the most costly area of the marketing process. Think of how much you spent on your last Google PPC campaign and how many qualified leads were generated from that campaign. Think of how much you spent to exhibit at your most recent tradeshow and the number of qualified leads that were generated from that event. Web 2.0 has created an environment where one could easily leverage what we will call human capital. This started with eBay (albeit Web 1.0) where your ‘stuff’ is valuable because there is someone willing to purchase it. Prosper.com created a marketplace where your liquid cash can be ‘sold’ for higher interest rates because there is someone willing to pay a premium for a loan. More recently expert networks have become a common place where professionals could earn extra money (often referred to as an honorarium) by speaking to companies looking to leverage their knowledge (check out glgroup.com). Prior to an expert network a company would have no alternative but to hire a consulting firm whose analysts would serve as the industry experts on the desired subject. The analysts would do their research gathering information on their own and sifting through the bits and pieces to come up with their own conclusions that they would share with their clients for a very hefty fee. Online expert networks (the Web 2.0 flavor) bypass the analysts and consulting firms connecting the company directly with the industry expert.

Prospecting 2.0 works in a similar vein. Rather than a company using Google or other traditional marketing tools to drive responses, leads, etc. they bypass them by going directly to the source of the opportunity. They do this by creating a marketplace for referrals driven either by the buyer (of the qualified leads) or the seller. Companies like Myndnet, LeadVine and ThePerfectNetworker allow buyers to literally publish their lead request and the fee they are willing to pay for the referral. Companies like Inquisix and Passitto take the sellers approach by allowing a seller to list their referral or contact opportunity and allowing buyers to purchase their connections. Companies like Salesconx do both buy and sell introductions to decision makers. Are they working? It is probably too early to tell as a sector, but $10 billion will be spent in 2008 by businesses in the US on lead and opportunity generation. Checking out these companies sites, it isn’t just small businesses using these services. Myndnet has a few listings from Netscout, Passitto has a law firm, and Salesconx has Administaff, MessageLabs and Berlin Pacific. Companies of all sizes are faced with the constant struggle and desire to grow. In a day and age when every dollar counts, isn’t it time for Prospecting 2.0?

Learn more about the author, Evan Sohn.

Comment on this article

  • President & Chief Strategist 
Seattle, Washington 
Philip Shaw
    Posted by Philip Shaw, Seattle, Washington | Sep 03, 2008

    Evan, I like where you are going with this and I think you do a diligent job at laying out the landscape, processes (old and new), and some of the players. It's articles like this that should begin the dialogue of what is valuable, what is happening.

    My biggest frustration with all of the jibber-jabber (respect to Mr. T) is that the "2.0" and the "expert" monikers that are following the trend of social networks/Web 2.0 are quickly going to become passe - if arguably they haven't already.

    What makes sense is what has never happened: sales and marketing to leverage one another regardless of whether the tools are traditional mediums (what does that mean anymore) or new media (uhhhhmmm, can o' worms, right there!)

    The "universal" (meaning that it is reported from many analysts) data that has been touted for a few years now that sales teams use or act on less than 10% of what mar/com resources produce is the heralding cry we should all be looking towards when it comes to seeing what's next.

    What's next should be a true Mar/Com/Sales Integration, because the tools are really available and the decades old arguments are no longer relevant.

  • CPA/Tax Accountant 
Bellevue, Washington 
John Huddleston
    Posted by John Huddleston, Bellevue, Washington | Sep 04, 2008

    Interesting stuff Evan. I'm going to check out these companies.

    Huddleston Tax Consulting

  • Chief Executive Officer 
Federal Way, Washington 
Richard Whitaker
    Posted by Richard Whitaker, Federal Way, Washington | Sep 05, 2008

    You gave me a couple of great ideas. Thanks

  • Business Networking 
New York, New York 
Evan Sohn
    Posted by Evan Sohn, New York, New York | Sep 05, 2008

    Thanks for your comments.

  • writer, speaker 
newport, Oregon 
carol stanley
    Posted by carol stanley, newport, Oregon | Sep 13, 2008

    It is the way the world is turning and your information is great...carol stanley author of For Kids 59.99 & Over.

  • Designer of Interiors and their Products 
Mountainside, New Jersey 
Pat Valentine Ziv
    Posted by Pat Valentine Ziv, Mountainside, New Jersey | Sep 29, 2008

    More food for thought. I think I understood you to say that all this blogging/reading/ time consumption is just the means to the end. Am I on the right track? Just pay for the most efficient lead director.

  • IT Officer 
Washington D.C., D.C. 
Sarah Beals
    Posted by Sarah Beals, Washington D.C., D.C. | Jan 12, 2011

    Thanks for taking this opportunity to discuss this, I feel fervently about this and I like learning about this subject. If possible, as you gain information, please update this blog with more information. I have found it really useful. Nursing essays

  • Account 
Accord, New York 
Allen Wood
    Posted by Allen Wood, Accord, New York | Feb 03, 2011

    foreign currency

  • pr consultant 
Massillon, Ohio 
cathy juliet David
    Posted by cathy juliet David, Massillon, Ohio | Jan 24, 2013

    Great stuff Evan!! Really interesting and informative. You really prompted some great new ideas. Yearn more to learn about the subject. Please find time to update this blog with more new innovative information. I too want to check out these companies.click this link

Closed_info