Seattle Community

Dex_phoenix
<span class="lite_member_name">Kelleen Griffin</span>
Kelleen Griffin
Business Consultant & Executive Coach for leaders seeking more balance, fulfillment, and prosperity!
Berkeley, California
Greatly helpful
8.1
out of 10
23 votes

What’s TARP got to do with it?

Remember back in October we were wondering how’d it get so bad so fast? This article is an update of what has happened since last October and how it affects you.
Written Feb 05, 2009, read 2489 times since then.
Closed_info

 

Remember back in October we were wondering how’d it get so bad so fast? We had the category killer event - subprime loans, which kicked off the downturn of our financial system. Then the trifecta hit - a recession, a credit crunch, and now massive layoffs.

Hard to stay focused, isn’t it? If you’re an employee somewhere, you’re wondering if the layoffs will impact you personally. If you’re a small business owner, you’re wondering how much of a decline you can handle in cash flow. And everyone wants to know: will my bank survive? And what does the economic stimulus package mean to me?

This article is an update of what has happened since last October and how it affects you. From October forward, the Treasury has been doling out cash like lollipops, courtesy of TARP – Troubled Asset Repair Program.

Now, right off the bat, we already have a problem. Like the ‘bailout’, TARP is mis-named. It does not repair any assets. After the legislation was passed, the method of disbursement was modified. Instead of buying up the bad loans, which would take too long, a capital purchase program was created. The top 9 financial institutions in the US were ‘encouraged’ to sign up for a forced injection of cash that amounted to $125 billion; $57 billion then went to Super-Regional Banks like KeyBank in Ohio and Regionals like Sterling here in WA. The community banks, of which there are about 8,000, were left to mop up the rest. In total about $194 billion has been doled out to date to about 300 banks, with more to come.

It is very important for all of us to understand the terms of this agreement. In exchange for cash, each of these institutions agrees to pay a 5% dividend per year for the first 5 years, and 9% thereafter.

Why is this important? Because there’s a lot of hype right now about all this money going into bank vaults and not lending it to small businesses to relieve the credit crunch. Let’s debunk the myth. Mullah is a bank’s inventory, right? If they pay 5% for their inventory, they have to lend it out at more than 5% to make some dough.

For example, Washington Federal got $303 million in TARP cash and it’ll cost them 5% per year, or roughly $15 million. In order to make any money they have to lend the cash out for more than 5% per year, right? Who are they going to lend it to and how much? Someone – a small business - will have to pay in excess of 8 or 9% on loans just for the bank to cover their overhead. So now we’re talking 10% or higher if the bank gets to make a profit…see how a credit crunch happens? There’s cash out there, but who can afford it?

To make matters worse, there’s still the nasty little capital reserves that each bank has to maintain. Remember that’s that certain percentage of every dollar lent that has to be tucked away in the vault just in case. It’s sometimes referred to as Tier 1 capital. The TARP money qualifies as Tier 1 capital, so regardless of the gruesome interest rate or the restrictions on executive compensation that come along with the TARP money, banks are gobbling the stuff up so they can shore up their capital reserves.

And that’s how we got here. What can you do?

It’s time to take personal inventory.

If you’re a small business owner, or if situations are such that you are considering becoming a small business owner, you have some options regarding financing. While most reports of SBA loans do show a drastic decline in the last three months, almost 60%, in the 7(a) loans guaranteed by the government, there are still some banks doing a volume business. Banks that operate in our area with a commitment to SBA include USBank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and KeyBank. Local community banks with a somewhat active presence in these loans include Heritage, Sterling, and a few others. Go here for SBA lenders in WA State. You’ll be able to see who is a preferred lender and get contact information.

If you have an unsecured line of credit, and you have borrowed against it in the last 6 months, and your credit rating dipped to GOOD from EXCELLENT, don’t be surprised if Amex et al. drops your total line down to the amount you’ve borrowed, cancelling the excess. They need liquidity, and they don’t want to be lending to you if they think you’re beginning to feel the pinch.

This means you have to have a back-up plan. Contact your accountant, get financial statements created, demonstrate that you are a for-profit entity, that your cash flow can support a loan of $75,000. You’ll be charged 6% for a 7 year repayment, plus approx. $1,870 in servicing fees annually.

Okay, this next part is for everyone, whether a small business owner or not. You are the CEO of your own personal life and I’m going to share with you something that is essential. No matter what happens, whether you keep or lose your job, whether you close your business or sweat it out and keep your doors open, whether your house is under-valued, or your investments have lost 40%, you are still a hero in your own life. There is a child, a man or woman, a furry friend that doesn’t care what title you have, or how much is in your bank account. They need you, and they love you. So do whatever you can to find a paycheck and make it work even if it means taking a job that is beneath your qualifications.

A lot of my clients right now can’t believe they are in this terrible situation. Drop the ego. Lose the denial. Get over yourself. Move on. All of our lives have been impacted, the ones who will survive are the ones who can adapt. So get busy.

How? Clean up your credit. But, Kel, you say, my credit is good. No, get on line and download your score and details from www.annualcreditreport.com. It is free once a year from each of the three reporting agencies. And you will be amazed at the number of credit cards you have accumulated since college. Gap, JCREW, Banana Republic, Sears, Neiman Marcus, Marshall Fields, unbelievable. You don’t need these cards, they have huge interest rates, and they require companies/banks to keep liquidity available in case you decide to use them. Cancel them and help the US liquidity system.

If you are having difficulty paying your mortgage and you can demonstrate the ability to pay once a reduced rate is applied, your mortgage institution may give you a ‘spot reduction.’ Meaning, on the spot, with the necessary documentation, some of the mortgage finance companies are realizing that it is much better to keep someone in their house and paying, than force them into default and foreclosure. Washington Federal for instance has set up a full Mortgage Service Center, for just this purpose, where they are regularly reviewing these rate decreases. Other banks are following – so call them and ask.

There is an old bank joke that goes: default on a $1 million, and it’s your problem; default on $100 million and it’s everyone’s problem.

This is everyone’s problem. With education and with sound business/personal judgment, we’ll get through it.

(If anyone knows of other banks offering spot reductions, I’d love to hear about it to pass it along to readers.)

Learn more about the author, Kelleen Griffin.

Comment on this article

  • eLearning, Presentation Design, Web Video, Voice-over 
Mercer Island, Washington 
Jim Dickeson
    Posted by Jim Dickeson, Mercer Island, Washington | Feb 05, 2009

    Kelleen,

    Thank you for hitting on issues that most of us never thought of, that the government and the media didn't tell us. It never occurred to me that credit cards with huge limits lying around unused with zero balances are actually eating up banks' reserve requirements, which keeps more of the bailout bucks in the vaults and not out there stimulating the economy.

    Lesson: don't just cut the cards up and throw them away. Call the issuers and close the accounts!

    But one thing I've wondered. When a bank has a batch of nonperforming mortgages, and they have to foreclose on some of them, which ones do the choose?

    The ones at 90% mortgage and 10% equity? If it would cost them 20% of the value to foreclose and resell, they'd lose money. (100% value less 90% loan less 20%)

    Or the ones at 30% mortgage and 70% equity. If it costs 20% to foreclose and resell, they reap a 50% profit. (100% value less 30% loan less 20%)

    The 10% equity guy hasn't much to lose, so the bank hasn't much to gain. But the 70% equity guy has a lot to loose, so the bank has a lot to gain.

    It seems that the bank has the incentive to screw the guy who's better managed his affairs.

  • Business Consultant & Executive Coach for leaders seeking more balance, fulfillment, and prosperity! 
Berkeley, California 
Kelleen Griffin
    Posted by Kelleen Griffin, Berkeley, California | Feb 05, 2009

    Alas, Jim, you are correct. Far less likely to get help if you have a huge equity base. Although there should be some refi ability that maybe can get the cash outlay down to a reasonable base... argh! Maddening isn't it?

  • thinkspace - Building a community of entrepreneurs. Thinkspace provides office space, virtual offices, & meeting rooms in the Seattle area. 
Redmond, Washington 
Peter Chee
    Posted by Peter Chee, Redmond, Washington | Feb 05, 2009

    Kellen, this topic has been on my mind all day. I was reviewing the list of local banks that received TARP money (see link below) and noticed that my bank was on the list. So today I went in and asked the branch manager what they are doing with the $MM of dollars that they received and he told me that they are holding it and may use it for acquiring other banks. It's a strategy for them as a way to grow.

    The manager said if they decide to loan the money out to businesses and people, then it will take a few months to figure out what the process will be before they can lend it.

    The crazy thing is that the government made a pretty quick decision to sign off on $700B and handed it out pretty quickly too. Normally, one would think that the government is slow to make decisions, but in this case banks are now the bottleneck.

    Your point about Tier 1 capital is interesting. Banks that received TARP funds are hoarding cash to shore up their capital reserved. If Banks intend to use TARP money for that purpose then it's not ever going to find it's way to the people.

    After this conversation with the bank manager, I'm more than convinced that the bailout plan is completely ineffective and totally worthless. I think that once a bank accepts bailout money, they should be scrutinized by every single tax payer.

    Find your bank and ask them the same question. The Seattle Times Article on Local Banks that Received TARP money

  • Life, Prosperity, and Small Business Coach. Author. Speaker. Trainer. Singer/Songwriter. 
Seattle, Washington 
Kate Phillips
    Posted by Kate Phillips, Seattle, Washington | Feb 05, 2009

    Kelleen, you always have something thought provoking and valuable to say, and I LOVE your attitude. Your personal advice to us all to get over ourselves, drop the ego, and be there for those that love and depend on us is perfect.

    But I've GOT to say to everyone reading the discussion:

    DO NOT GO CANCEL YOUR OLD CREDIT CARD ACCOUNTS! You might not like the result.

    One major factor in your credit scoring is the average length of time you've had your credit - i.e.; what's the average age of your credit accounts? Old is good, that's how people get credit scores in the 800's.

    When you shut down old credit cards, your accounts are now YOUNGER, and your score may drop considerably because of it! So make sure you're not killing your oldest accounts and leaving newer ones. (Closing younger ones would not have this negative effect, as a matter of fact, it can raise your score, and as Kelleen says, help the banks too.)

    Another major factor in FICO scores is the ratio of debt to available credit. Yes, you probably don't need $200k available on 37 Visa's (and you would get docked for having so much credit available).

    But if you have, say, $8k in credit card debt, and you close old credit cards so that now your credit limits total $16k, you've just raised your debt-to-available-credit ratio to 50%, and yes, dropped your credit score.

    Your debt-to-limit ratio should ideally be under 30%. That is true overall, and also for each card, in order to maintain the highest credit score (or improve a sagging one.) So cancel cautiously, especially if you need a high credit score in the near future.

    These things may sound counter-intuitive, yes, it seems logical that closing old credit cards would be good, but 8-1/2 years in real estate and mortgages, learning what worked and didn't work from the experts who were helping my clients raise their scores (not to mention adventures with my own credit score) has wisened me up.

    You may need that old Sears card you got 20 years ago in your credit card portfolio, even if you will never use it.

    (I'll be interviewing a credit expert and fellow biznik with a sky-high score about all these things soon, if anyone wants an mp3, drop me a line with your email. I'll be sure to ask him how the length-of-time factor weighs against the too-many-cards factor!)

    To answer your other question, MANY banks are offering special mortgage programs right now - loan modifications, loss mitigation, counseling, FHA refis, putting payments on the back end, etc. I don't know one that's NOT making an attempt to be helpful.

    Just like TARP money, it's not necessarily available to those who need it most, but there has never been a better time to negotiate with a lender than now. I can help coach someone through options (and sanity).

  • Markitect 
Berlin, Connecticut 
Bill Doerr
    Posted by Bill Doerr, Berlin, Connecticut | Feb 05, 2009

    Kelleen,

    X-ray insight, pragmatic advice. Excellent article.

    Thank you.

  • digital imaging specialist 
Seattle, Washington 
Rick Sader
    Posted by Rick Sader, Seattle, Washington | Feb 05, 2009

    Thanks for that article Kelleen. And thanks for your input Peter. It irks me to think that some banks would take the TARP $$ and then use it mainly for their own growth via aquisitions. Especially when the relatively tiny amnt of $$ I need for my biz could be put to such good use. Looks like there isn't enough oversight built into this bailout to ensure that a high % of the funds actually gets pumped into the economy via small biz loans, etc. Very short-sighted on the part of our lawmakers.

    The list of SBA lenders is very valuable. Thanks for that. I will definitly look into that avenue to get the funding I will need shortly for my small biz. If I remember correctly, the SBA is more likely to make small biz loans since they are backed up by the fed. gov't.

    Will be interesting to see how this all shakes out over the next 2-4 years. I have a lot of hope that the new 'sherriff' in town is not gonna take any sxxx.

    Rick

  • Business Consultant & Executive Coach for leaders seeking more balance, fulfillment, and prosperity! 
Berkeley, California 
Kelleen Griffin
    Posted by Kelleen Griffin, Berkeley, California | Feb 05, 2009

    Wow, great information everyone...here's some more.

    @Peter - great point about acquisitions, some banks are hoarding the cash for this very reasons. There's been a lot of talk around linking a bank's lending growth to a satisfactory/ non-satisfactory rating for acquisitions, like a CRA rating, where a bank can't acquire anyone if their rating is poor. Also, the fine print on the TARP requires that the government be checked in with on acquisitions. One of the things I didn't mention here, is to be aware of whether your bank has massive amounts of lending in the construction real estate arena. Banks are taking gobs of write-offs right now and more to come in this stuff. This is a part of the reason for the acquisition alert, it is widely believed that come the second quarter of this year more banks will be on the chopping block because of those loans. Most banks have just announced earnings in WA state, so do go check it out with your banker to ascertain the health of the bank.

    Last comment here - the good news is that we have another $400 billion in TARP to dole out. And lawmakers are very well aware of your comments, Peter. Watch for an accounting measure to be imposed shortly. Here's the listing of banks that received TARP money:

    http://www.treas.gov/initiatives/eesa/docs/transaction_report_02-02-09.pdf

    @Kate - Thank you so much for your helpful comments. Kate is absolutely right. If you have NO other credit or the little credit,16K, she referred to, or just got your very first line of credit, do not cancel those cards. I'm really grateful for the clarification. Many of us have the regular MC, VISA, AMEX, with pretty high limits, and have really old $1k or $2k limit credit cards. If that's your case, my advice holds. Cancel 'em and help the US liquidity system.

    Regarding anyone who is a homeowner looking for support, I found this terrific website, but it was too late to put it in the article: www.hopenow.org

    @Rick, I can't stress enough how important it is to find an SBA lender who does ALOT of these loans. They get it and you won't get the run around. Either they can do the loan, or they can't and you'll know pretty quickly. Right now, US Bank leads the pack across the nation and was one of only three banks to report a growth in their lending in the last quarter. The others were SunTrust and BB&T. These banks are open for business. Good luck.

  • Writer, traveler, bon vivant 
Seattle, Washington 
Betsy Talbot
    Posted by Betsy Talbot, Seattle, Washington | Feb 05, 2009

    I'm sending this article to all my friends just like I did with your first one. Love that you spell it out so clearly (why can't everyone else do that?). Thanks for sharing your expertise, Kelleen.

  • digital imaging specialist 
Seattle, Washington 
Rick Sader
    Posted by Rick Sader, Seattle, Washington | Feb 05, 2009

    The link to the lists of TARP recipients did not work for me. This is what I copied & pasted:

    http://www.treas.gov/initiatives/eesa/docs/transactionreport02-02-09.pdf

    Can you double check? Thanks.

    Rick

  • Business Consultant & Executive Coach for leaders seeking more balance, fulfillment, and prosperity! 
Berkeley, California 
Kelleen Griffin
    Posted by Kelleen Griffin, Berkeley, California | Feb 05, 2009

    Hey Rick. Weird. It just happened to me too. Try going directly to the treasury website: www.treas.gov and then click on the right sidebar, called Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, and a bunch of additional links should come up. You're looking for the one called Transactions, scroll down til you see it....

    Let me know if this works.

    @Betsy - you are such a dear. Thank you for the nice words...Kel

  • Shea Butter Spa Products 
Lynnwood, Washington 
Rebecca Wood
    Posted by Rebecca Wood, Lynnwood, Washington | Feb 05, 2009

    Eye-opening information! Thanks for everyones input. Certainly put things in perspective.

  • Couples Therapist 
Kirkland, Washington 
Karen Richards
    Posted by Karen Richards, Kirkland, Washington | Feb 05, 2009

    Thanks for the fantastic article Kelleen!

    I have what is perhaps a basic question for anyone to answer. There is talk on this thread of finding out how solid your bank is. If my bank is FDIC, and I just have a checking account, and am not borrowing money, do I need to worry about it closing and taking my cash? Isn't that what FDIC is supposed to be about? That it's insured, so I can rest easy and not start a run on the bank, right? So if that's my case, is there another reason that I need to be concerned about the solidity of my bank?

    Thanks for any help/responses.

  • Accountant/Marketing 
Kirkland, Washington 
Chris Maxfield
    Posted by Chris Maxfield, Kirkland, Washington | Feb 05, 2009

    Per Suzie Orman - if you cancel a credit card you will lower your FICO score - hard to believe, but true. Be careful before you cancel a card.

  • Life, Prosperity, and Small Business Coach. Author. Speaker. Trainer. Singer/Songwriter. 
Seattle, Washington 
Kate Phillips
    Posted by Kate Phillips, Seattle, Washington | Feb 05, 2009

    Thanks Chris, this is true - be very careful. I explain why above.

    The more I think about what you shared about the banks, Kelleen (I was completely unaware of the interest rate they have to pay on the money they were forced to borrow), the more I see how the whole scenario was set up to be problemmatic from the beginning.

    It's like if we were forced to take large business loans and had to factor in repayment of that loan into all decisions... we might have to raise our rates, cut our costs, eliminate the pro-bono work, or... acquire another business! What a flawed system it has become.

    And you're right - we're all in this together, and the best we can do is take personal inventory and personal responsibility. (While asking some hard questions of our banks and lawmakers.)

  • Management/Financial Consultant 
Atlanta, Georgia 
M.Usman Mirza
    Posted by M.Usman Mirza, Atlanta, Georgia | Feb 06, 2009

    As the banks add TARP funds to their net capital, it is not just making up the deficiency, in many cases it does add to their lending ability. Leveraged impact means that the real cost to the bank is not 5% for each dollar they lend out but it is significantly reduced cost on the overall loan amount. Thus, they can still make low cost loans. Based on my recent experiences in negotiating with a number of community banks and other regional banks who have received TARP funds, the real issues are the quality of the borrower's credit, project quality and early stage learning problems in managing the new procedures. All of the comments so far have been very helpful in understanding the fluid market conditions. It is also evident that there has been only a small part of the funding that has been given out to the banks while the politicians keep talking as if all the money had been used up. While Georgia had more than its share of bad banks, there are many others who are doing well and are lending even for real estate where the situations are right.

  • Co-Founder 
Lake Forest Park, Washington 
Sara Yao
    Posted by Sara Yao, Lake Forest Park, Washington | Feb 06, 2009

    Hi Kelleen -

    GREAT article! Actionable items for me to take on and I feel educated about the whole situation. Thanks for taking the time to post it. Hope you are well...

    Sara

  • eLearning, Presentation Design, Web Video, Voice-over 
Mercer Island, Washington 
Jim Dickeson
    Posted by Jim Dickeson, Mercer Island, Washington | Feb 06, 2009

    Kate,

    Thanks for tempering my comments. Seriously. Thanks. This is where our many head are better than one. God forbid anyone listen solely to me.

    FWIW, I've got two bank cards (no store cards) that I've had for 10 and maybe 20 years. Both have ridiculously high credit limits, my debt to limit runs between 2 and 4 percent, and (this one actually hurts my score) I always pay the balances in full.

  • Blogging Coach and Copywriter 
Seattle, Washington 
Judy Dunn
    Posted by Judy Dunn, Seattle, Washington | Feb 06, 2009

    Jumping in a little late here, Kelleen. Your article is timely because I am just finishing up an article on the bailout for The Business Report. In it I compare local banks that received TARP funds with those that did not.

    Thanks for throwing more light on this issue. I can just say that we all need to pay attention to this legislation— as taxpayers, as consumers and as small biz owners.

    I think it's important to understand that what started out as a bailout with the government buying up bad loans became a "buy-in," where taxpayers were investing in healthy banks. With that change, the feds were only looking at banks with sufficiently high CAMEL ratings (ranking of a bank's financial health and soundness). The thought was why give money to troubled banks and see the taxpayers' investment lost. Give it to healthy banks so they will put it back into the economy in the form of loans for consumers and businesses.

    So far, it hasn't exactly worked that way. Some banks are using it as an "insurance policy" against future losses and another VP I interviewed is using the money to buy a troubled bank. So the money isn't exactly being used for its intended purpose.

    Yesterday I interviewed The CEO of a community bank that decided not to apply for TARP money. He did so for certain reasons: 1) They were financially sound and 2) there was no definition of what the rules were.

    Sure enough, Congress added the rules midstream.

    Banks now have to make monthly reports to account for use of funds (not necessarily a bad thing, but this CEO said it's difficult to keep funds separately tracked, with the bank's own funds and TARP funds both being used to make loans). But the larger issue for him was the 5% cash dividend rule: a $50,000 premium paid back to the government for every one million of TARP funds. He couldn't justify taking that money away from the bank's shareholders.

    He also said that he suspects some banks are having problems making the loans. People are fearful right now. Their thinking is, "What if things get worse? What if I get laid off? As a small biz owner, what if I don't have enough purchase orders out there and I see a significant decrease in my cash flow?"

    So, yes, if people can stop basing their actions on fear, things will start looking up overall. And complicating it further, the credit requirements are tightening up, so fewer people are qualifying for loans.

    I have learned a lot in my research for this article, but I admit I am no financial whiz. I'm glad we have talented and generous people like Kelleen, Kate and other bizniks to help us out!

    Thanks for the great advice, Kelleen.

    This is a complicated issue

  • thinkspace - Building a community of entrepreneurs. Thinkspace provides office space, virtual offices, & meeting rooms in the Seattle area. 
Redmond, Washington 
Peter Chee
    Posted by Peter Chee, Redmond, Washington | Feb 07, 2009

    @Judy I would love to know which Community Bank did not apply for TARP. I'd open up an account and start doing business with them immediately. I have no desire to support banks that took TARP money that 1) did not need it or 2) are hoarding it and just sitting on it.

  • Seattle Whistleblower Attorney 
Bellevue, Washington 
Mark Walters
    Posted by Mark Walters, Bellevue, Washington | Feb 09, 2009

    A thoughtful and intelligent discussion . . . the more I learn, the angrier I become. Thanks everyone.

    Mark

  • Process Consultant and Leadership Coach 
Eastsound, Washington 
Gretchen  Krampf
    Posted by Gretchen Krampf , Eastsound, Washington | Feb 12, 2009

    Thanks for offering us clarity on TARP, Kelleen. We live in interesting times and most of us are trying to understand what's going on behind the curtain, with little success.

    I am in DC this week and there's tension in the air. Lots of posturing.

    Yesterday's POST had a great article by Steven Pearlstein on a small bank that's doing the RIGHT thing with its TARP funding. http://tinyurl.com/bcwm6y

    Sorry, Peter, they did take the bucks...but they're using it to strengthen their own community. That's a concept that works for me.

    Gretchen

  • Computer Fixer-Upper and People De-Stresser 
Everett, Washington 
Peter Kessler
    Posted by Peter Kessler, Everett, Washington | Feb 12, 2009

    Hi Kelleen, Thanks for the great article! I wanted to tell you and the commenters that the Hope Now program is not the best way to go. If you read the fine print, it states that the program get first position in any equity your house generates, and that that equity must go back to the government as soon as it is generated. Unless they've (hopefully) changed the rules.

  • chef and cooking instructor 
Seattle, Washington 
Susan Rolfe
    Posted by Susan Rolfe, Seattle, Washington | Feb 12, 2009

    What a great article. Packed with useful information; incisive, intelligent, and compassionate.

    Thank you so much for posting.

  • Producer  
North Hollywood, California 
Brian White
    Posted by Brian White, North Hollywood, California | Feb 12, 2009

    Nice article!

  • Marriage and Family Therapist 
Seattle, Washington 
Matthew Gittleman
    Posted by Matthew Gittleman, Seattle, Washington | Feb 12, 2009

    A terrific synopsis on the issues that confront small business owners who are looking to their lenders to remain solvent. I'm wondering about the notion of who comes first for these financial institutions: the small business owner, which, incidentally, was at the center of much of the exhausting campaign we just went through, or the tangled web of firms that need to satisfy clients who want their money out of these toxic assets? In other words, are these banks holding fast to these TARP funds out of sheer terror that a run on assets, similar to the run on money market assets back in September, would bankrupt them? I believe that these derivatives, like the credit default swaps, estimated to exceed $60 TRILLION worldwide, need to be unwound before any sense of normalcy is restored to credit markets. Many of these financial institutions have a lot more to worry about than making loans to "little folks" out here. What other sources of capital might be available outside of traditional lenders like B of A? I think that many of those institutions are going down. It's just a matter of time....

  • Cafe DeWitt @ CWU 
Ellensburg, Washington 
rance dewitt
    Posted by rance dewitt, Ellensburg, Washington | Feb 15, 2009

    Today the prize to win in the proxy war of the Middle East is not Iraq- it is Eastern Europe.

    The Czech Republic and Christian Poland remember a slavery under Russia that did not include 40 acres and a mule.

    Their lessons from Stalin earns a red badge of courage.

    Losing Eastern Europe through political naiveté makes every war America fought meaningless. And all those who fought- in vain.

     Marching backwards to Selma, Alabama is something only Hollywood could create. Spending borrowed money on social welfare programs is a carpetbaggers dream. Bankers and baseball players fly Leer jets while the poor get their version of the million dollar mansion. I saw Essau sell the birthright of a nation for stew and a chromed 4-wheel ride. The Spirit of America went south. Stupidity became paramount. And the youth were deceived.
    

    I also saw the opportunity at the gas pump last year to create an energy plan with natural gas, electricity and high tech diesel that would jump-start transportation evolution and give this country a leadership edge in culling wasteful growths.

    Shouldn't every Lincoln penny be spent on energy- even coal? Remember Chinese coal falling like rain on Kansas in 10 years? Today they ‘bomb’ the clouds with chemicals to ‘irrigate’. Without leadership in true American principles we are just a pundit nation that lost it’s consensus of what is right and how to reach it.

    Jesus said, “I will give you a new heart”. Coming from Catholic Poland, Pope John Paul recognized a ‘problem’ in Rome. For this he worked with Presidents Reagan and Brezhnev to give all the West new hope.

    Evangelicals and Fundamentalists (bless their hearts) methodically incite the Left to treason then raise a great shout for morality. They should look East- their new Messiah could be Iranian.

    Vladimir Putin fired one shot this winter and froze Western Europe into submission. But Catholic Poland and the middle kingdoms have a tough heart for freedom and a will to be America’s shield.

    Without these more than confidence will be lost. The stakes are very high but all the cards are now on the table. The only question is: what’s the game- hearts or spades? Furrows or foxholes?

    Rance DeWitt Firefox/Google Letters to the Editor Central Washington University

  • Accounting/HR/Admin Consulting & Services, now Aflac, too! 
Bellingham, Washington 
Kelly Pederson
    Posted by Kelly Pederson, Bellingham, Washington | Feb 20, 2009

    Thanks for the great information, Kelleen, and thanks to the valuable additional comments by your readers!

Closed_info