Hi Christian: I must be old fashioned as I like those words. What else is there? I'm curious.
Branding & Marketing - Create new names for them?
I had lunch/coffee with Jeff Fisher (a fellow Biznikian) yesterday and we discussed the current terms for what we do and what they mean, and how the terms/words alone have been damaged by some bad apples. Jeff and I are in the Brand camp, not marketing so I can't speak for those in that field.
Have the words Branding and Marketing run their course? Should we create new words for them?
It is well known in our industry that they both have some negative equity in them when people mention them. Why? I'd like to know your point of view.
25 Bizniks have posted replies
-
Posted by Paul McFadden, Bellevue, Washington | Apr 16, 2008
-
Posted by Christian Messer, Portland, Oregon | Apr 16, 2008
I have no idea.
My main reason for posting was to get your opinions on the matter - like:
Have you (or anyone in the field of work) experienced the terms to have negative connotations? If so, what can be done about it?
Or should we just continue without discussing - a non-issue?
-
Posted by Havi Brooks, Portland, Oregon | Apr 17, 2008
Well, both branding and marketing are words that are so "big", so layered, and can mean so many things to so many people that they are always going to be a bit loaded.
Of course, we're probably more used to this happening with words like: "feminism", "religious", "yoga", etc. There are all sorts of words that hold deep, personal meanings -- but totally different ones -- for different people, and to some extent these words can sometimes lose their usefulness as communication tools.
But I think it absolutely happens in the business world too. When I started my business I had only negative associations with branding (um, burning cows with a hot iron, right? Yuck! Why would I want to do that to my business?).
If I examine my personal definitions for "branding" and "marketing" back then, they both contained things like "sleazy" and "manipulative" and "soulless". Later, I learned to "translate" them.
I learned to understand that marketing isn't about convincing someone or selling myself, but about shining a light so that the people who need me can find me and receive help. I realized that branding is a way to focus that light so that I can connect with just the right people for the work I do.
But there is still an element of translation that goes on. A split second of delayed reaction. I'd still much rather use other words, if it were up to me.
Definitely an issue worth discussing! I'm curious as to what people have to say.
-
Posted by Mark Silver, Portland, Oregon | Apr 17, 2008
Yes- it's an excellent topic- well worth discussing.
I use a very different word than 'branding'- I use 'worldview.' When a client enters your business, even just through your marketing, they are entering your world. By having a coherent worldview, you can help the client feel at home, etc, etc.
We teach a five-day retreat based partially on this insight, and have an entire approach to creating it, that takes in a lot of 'typical' branding stuff, plus some deeper spiritual content.
-
Posted by Mark Silver, Portland, Oregon | Apr 17, 2008
'Marketing' I don't have as big a problem with- simply because it means, for me, showing up in the market place- literally 'going to market.' I think of the outdoor bazaars, where people show up, meet, have tea, and in general are in community with one another.
'Meet you down at the market' is what 'marketing' means to me- so I'm happy to keep using it.
-
Posted by Christian Messer, Portland, Oregon | Apr 17, 2008
I laughed when I read Havi's : (um, burning cows with a hot iron, right? Yuck! Why would I want to do that to my business?)
Havi - yes, exactly as you mentioned, marketing having that "sleazy" and "manipulative" and "soulless" connotation. It's the 1 bad apple kind of thing. Of course multiplied.
Mark - I hear you on the marketing - although I have not heard or thought of it in that scope. Interesting.
-
Posted by Barry Hurd, Seattle, Washington | Apr 17, 2008
For my own point of view, I see branding and marketing having lost definition. I would say 9 out of 10 consumers actually have no idea what the difference is between the two. On many instances public relations can be thrown into that watery grave too.
Ultimately the words are meaningless. Businesses (and people) are either "hot or not". It doesn't make a lick of difference to most of them if PR, Marketing, Advertising, Branding, or random drug testing leads clients to them. They are simply seeking a result, not the words describing how a result is reached.
Any direct decision maker will tell you what they want is the result. Of course as promotional professionals we are tasked with the challenge of leading them through planning, asset coordination, strategy, execution, and reaching the final goal.
When talking with most professionals I use the terms promotion and reputation a lot. Every wants to be promoted, everyone wants to have a reputation (hopefully a good one!)
Does everyone want a brand? What is a brand? If I have a brand for my business, is my brand me or is it something else?
As I look at the sales to solution cycle of reaching a new client, educating them on a word or thought as abstract as marketing and brand is rather pointless. They know what it is under various other descriptive terms and they just need to relate to the desire of having it.
-
Posted by Kaya Singer, Portland, Oregon | Apr 17, 2008
Christian
This is a great topic. I think the words are both understood by people so I wouldn't mess with it. I think that it is all about knowing your potential client and being able to talk to them about how "branding" will help their business specifically and what that means so people see the benefits.
Marketing is a huge umbrella word that means different things to different industries. Again- it is about you showing the specific area of marketing that you help people with. It is all about differentiating yourself and how you present your business to your market.
-
Posted by Christian Messer, Portland, Oregon | Apr 17, 2008
Barry - very true. Businesses and people are looking for results, no matter the term used to get them there. One of the aspects of this was to see if any of you had noticed that the terms had lost their steam and become cliché.
And Kaya, yes it is up to me and anyone in the field to educate if needed, and to present my offerings in a way that is crystal clear what it is that I can provided for the client, the results they will receive.
I hope others will chime in - again my point was to see this issue through the Biznik community's eyes and gain some other points of view.
Branding to me is incredible - I thrive on it. I find it incredibly fascinating and have a passion for it, married of course with my passion for design.
-
Posted by Sierra Faye Kennedy LMP, Seattle, Washington | Apr 24, 2008
branding and marketing... yes they both do, indeed have some baggage.
YEs! come up with new words!
I think I start to snore and/or get nervous and tired when I hear both of those words.
They have a history of being something that:
*other people know how to do better
*is totally complex to do so you might as well give up trying to do either yourself
*has all sorts of public interface aspects (witch is totally scary for lots of folks - I mean - if we get all blown up in public... how long till some dirt is uncovered?)
Effective tools; marketing and Branding.
Seems to me like one is putting on the package
the other: making said package "the thing you should never ever live without"
so right there you have this whole resistance to being told what to think.
and man I don't want to tell people what to think.
yes
come up
with new words
that describe the process of
- looking behind the scenes...
2.assessing the truth of the business/products/services etc,
3.creating the simple honest and intelligently perfect presentation for it
finding the best fit as far as the target audience
and then the implementation of "let her rip" marketing ideas that work deeply and effectively for all parties involved in the business venture in question. (best to have ideas that create the most return for the least amount of effort - I would figure)
Anyway - i should probably edit this comment to make it run smoother but that's my general opinion of your presented question. :)
-
Posted by Christian Messer, Portland, Oregon | Apr 24, 2008
Sierra - I like your train of thought.
I certainly think that this will be a long process, if not new words, at least I can educate and help my clients understand my philosophy on Branding. Marketing is mixed in there, but for now, I am focusing on Identity & Branding.
Thank you everyone for your comments. Much more to discuss and let simmer for a while.
-
Posted by Andrey Rozmaity, Renton, Washington | Apr 24, 2008
I think the words branding and marketing are great and I haven't noticed the terms having a negative connotation.
Are you looking to "2.0" them? ;]
If all fails we can say branding and marketing in French or Spanish -- they'll probably sound sexy which is a plus.
When they get old again... we can come up with a word like colonel. [Does anyone see an "R" in this word??? Oh, yeah... "In modern English, the word colonel is pronounced similarly to kernel (of grain) as a result of entering the language from Middle French in two competing forms, dissimilated coronel and colonel. The more conservative spelling colonel was favored in written use and eventually became the standard spelling even as it lost out in pronunciation to coronel."] The word sounds good but is spelled 100% differently...
I think I got it... We'll leave spell branding and marketing the same but we'll pronounce branding as birthing-your-business and marketing as make-you-more-money!
Watch the money come in. ;]
Good luck Christian with this little dilemma,
-Andrey
-
Posted by Sierra Faye Kennedy LMP, Seattle, Washington | Apr 24, 2008
to just add more thought - I don't know about your branding and identity tactics and strategies but I tend to think of those things as rather intimate work.
You have your work cut out for you. It's almost like soul-searching to come up with a brand and identity that really speaks the truth in a way that resonates with the audience.
it took years to get it out of me and, of course, one must leave room for growth, change and evolution of identity.
-
Posted by Christian Messer, Portland, Oregon | Apr 24, 2008
"it took years to get it out of me and, of course, one must leave room for growth, change and evolution of identity."
Yes - this is why it is important to invest time and energy to this process. For people who have not been in the business world, and are starting a business without that knowledge - Most people won't really know what they want, until after a couple of years. This is completely normal, and its a process that can last for years, to arrive at that final logo or mark.
Kaya Singer, a fellow Biznikian, helped me understand this a little more in a coaching session she and I had.
-
Posted by Havi Brooks, Portland, Oregon | Apr 27, 2008
Christian, I'd be interested in broadening this discussion of business-related words and the emotional "stuff" they sometimes trigger for some of us (or for some of our potential clients).
For example, "prospect" is a word that I can't stand. Mark Silver (Heart of Business) has a nice twist on that, calling those people "prospectors" who are coming to you to look for gold in your business.
And Seth Godin has a great post (http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/02/citizens-1.html) where he argues for calling them "citizens", as a way to remember that you're dealing with real, live human beings and not flies you're trying to lure into your spider parlor.
[And yes, btw, I don't understand the "formatting help" instructions on how to do links. Even asked my designer and he didn't get it either. Are we both incompetent idiots or are other people having trouble with this too?]
-
Posted by Christian Messer, Portland, Oregon | Apr 28, 2008
I think you are right Havi - and a broader discussion is indeed a good idea. I have just e-mailed Seth, about his. Not sure if he'll show up or reply, but I thought I'd give it a shot - I am a big fan of his philosophy on the new age of branding and marketing.
-
Posted by Jean Craciun, Seattle, Washington | Apr 30, 2008
I love this conversation...I do research for a living and have worked with lots of advertising, marketing, communications, pr, etc...firms. I am meeting with an advertising agency person next week and her title is Brand Architect....sorry but I laughed out loud!
-
Posted by Jeff Fisher, Portland, Oregon | Apr 30, 2008
Christian -
I think the major thing that came out of our lunch conversation for me was that so many people - professionals providing services and their clients - just toss around terms like "branding" and "marketing" without any understanding of what they actually mean or a true expectation of what can be provided for a business under those terms. "Brand" has become such an industry "buzz word" that even the smallest business owner throws it out to a designer - and suddenly you realize that in the simplest terms they are just asking for a logo without having a clue in regards to the broader requirements of an actual brand.
The over-used terminology of the times often gets in the way of a business or organization understanding or getting what they really need for growth and success.
In writing my first book back in 2003 I expressed my annoyance with the terminology "synergy," "out of the box" and "on the same page." I still cringe whenever I hear any of those used by a professional in talking with a client.
I always enjoy responding to "out of the box" with "I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean - I've never allowed myself to be put in a box." That stops people cold.
Moving beyond the worn-out buzz words often requires simply communicating exactly what one means, needs or requires in plain ol' language that anyone/everyone can comprehend.
-
Posted by Jean Craciun, Seattle, Washington | Apr 30, 2008
A client I have in Alaska the Anchorage Museum wants to do a big Branding campaign and we are the first step ....conducting research.....well after the first round of focus groups I realized they didn't have an identity worth keeping and nobody really knows much about who or what they are...to top it all off they are building a new mega Museum! So I started explaining to them that they needed a "buzz" for the community to even start to care about what they are all about. So I guess what I am saying is trying to help create a buzz starts defining a group or organization......branding seems like a developed and working reputation.
-
Posted by Jeff Fisher, Portland, Oregon | Apr 30, 2008
Jean -
Museum projects are exciting and challenging. Creating the "buzz" is certainly an important element of the branding process - and does fill in a lot of the necessary "blanks" as you learn how a facility is perceived in the market. My sister and I did the same for an existing small museum in the Bay Area a couple years ago.
-
Posted by Judy Dunn, Seattle, Washington | Apr 30, 2008
Great topic, Christian. From listening to everyone, I can see that these words do indeed mean different things to different people. Perhaps instead of using the actual words, "branding" and marketing," it's easier to understand, to "be on the same page," (sorry, Jeff, couldn't resist!), if we describe the results.
So, to me, branding, or whatever you want to call it, is focusing down to your unique core, what you do better than anyone else, which is part of the process that leads you to your niche and your ideal customers.
A big part of marketing, to me, is getting the message out so, as Havi said, "the people who need me can find me."
There's a lot more to it than that, of course, but to me these are the distinctions. And branding and marketing go together. Just my two cents.
-
Posted by John Robertson, Burien, Washington | May 01, 2008
I agree with you, Jeff. While the word "marketing" does have some baggage, it's got less than some others... for example, say "advertising" or "sales". This because it has been misnomered so many times - for example, "telemarketing" isn't really marketing, it's sales prospecting or cold-calling.
I vote we fully define our terms, then leave the terminology alone. Today's trite buzzwords are last season's "newly coined definitions"; terms everyone parrots but few truly understand. For me, even "Branding" is a buzzword that buzzes a little too buzzily. I firmly believe that all real truth is basically simple: Marketing is the action of creating or discovering markets. Markets are places where people buy and sell stuff - places either literally or figuratively, but places. Branding is part of that process; simply creating an identity that de-commoditizes your product (in both your public's and your own eyes) and differentiates it from other products your potential buyer may find or become aware of. Changing the terminology of a concept is a lot like painting a house - A) It's useful to protect and sometimes to beautify your home (or idea), but it's still fundamentally the same house (or idea), and B) the more radically different you paint the house, the less likely people will be to recognize it, and some may get lost.
To further beat this analogy to death, the more coats you layer on, the more every part of it looks like every other part, the less detail you can see and you eventually have to strip it all off and start over. I think that's where marketing and branding come full circle - in fact, the 'back to basics' PR campaigns are all the fashion just now, while 'branding' complexity as such is so-five-minutes-ago already.
My two cents too.
-
Posted by Christian Messer, Portland, Oregon | May 06, 2008
Wow! I had to go see my dad through surgery in Alabama and was unable to keep up with this thread - sorry I haven't replied yet.
I see your point Jeff - and you're right. Although, I have never had the experience of a client throwing the words around. The people I am working with right now, knew exactly what I did, particularly with branding. They came to me and said, "I want you to do the same kind of branding that you did for so-and-so."
The two I can think of right off the bat - one is a realtor and the other a mortgage broker. Both are under the "umbrella" of a company - but wanted to differentiate themselves, because their company's materials were lacking and in need of help. With this situation - a logo is not needed, but a brand is - specifically shining a light on their strengths and differentiations between them and their peers in the field. They have to use the logo of said company, but they don't have to strictly abide by that company's branding.
Buzz words do eventually die and we are left with the words we have always used - already too many are tired of Web 2.0 - so, this is inevitable.
-
Posted by Jeff Fisher, Portland, Oregon | May 06, 2008
Christian - First of all, I hope your dad's surgery went well. I was sending good thoughts your way while you were out town. Missed you at the Portland biznik event.
In regards to your comment "already too many are tired of Web 2.0:" As far as design, especially identity design I'm now referring to it as "Web 2.Oh-Oh"
-
Posted by Christian Messer, Portland, Oregon | May 06, 2008
Thanks Jeff - too bad I missed that! Darn!
Oh well - we'll see each other at the meeting for SECP.
Hope there's another Biznik event again soon.
This forum is unmoderated, but please keep discussion courteous and not too far off topic.
Members posting in this topic
Post tags
- Add tags to make this topic more relevant.

