Lively post. Let me try to take inventory again.
I "got these right” the first time.
Some Bizniks undercharge.
"Charging more" is a good and sustainable concept. Low-priced promotions have a place. Low rates for startups building a portfolio or practice have a place.
It's easy to lose sight of your true expenses when you consider travel, admin, and miscellany.
And these points evolved, rather dramatically.
1. The “charge hourly” versus “don’t charge hourly” debate is heated. There probably isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer. 1a. Paul Spafford’s approach can work: hourly for some jobs, flat rate for others. 1b. A categorical statement like “Dumb” might make provocative copy but offended more than one person.
2. Most of us agree: A Biznik might underprice and might have self-esteem issues, it is unlikely that the two are highly correlated. (On a separate but related note, both Hsuan-Hua and I recommend Bizniks consider EQ tests.)
3. I began the string with a rather arbitrary number ($75/hour). There is no “right number” that applies to all industries. 3a. I do, however, stick by my original assertioni (which most seem to agree with): Bizniks would do well to update their assumptions about how much they can charge. It may be more than the last time you checked.
4. There may be different ways to package your services to garner higher rates. Karrie taught a course on it this past weekend. Karrie, anything to add here?
5. There may be interest in a “How to keep track of your time” seminar among Bizniks.
6. There may be interest in a “How to right-size your pricing” seminar.
Is this a fair summary? Have I captured everything?