Issaquah, WA Community

<span class="pro_member_name">Jacob Caldwell, LMP</span>
Jacob Caldwell, LMP
Massage - Medical Intuitive
Seattle (Capitol Hill), Washington
Posted by Jacob Caldwell, LMP, Seattle (Capitol Hill), Washington | Oct 18, 2009

Subscribe to Ask the Health Specialist - Discussion Universal Health Care! Alternative Care Killer?

I am very curious to what everyone's opinion is on Universal Health Care. I have not heard much on what it does or includes with Complementary Alternative Modalities. Anyone? Also, what do you think of the concept of UHC. Anyone have any alternative solutions?

7 Bizniks have posted replies

  • Jacob Caldwell, LMP
    Posted by Jacob Caldwell, LMP, Seattle (Capitol Hill), Washington | Oct 18, 2009

    My concern about Universal Health Care is that it is catering to the "take care of me crowd".

    I assume the cause of CAM care is to empower and educate people how to take care of themselves. Will this happen with Government care? Seems they pay for major surgeries rather than preventative care.

    $500 spent on massages a year can counter $30,000 in back surgery operations.

  • Jacob Caldwell, LMP
    Posted by Jacob Caldwell, LMP, Seattle (Capitol Hill), Washington | Oct 18, 2009

    UHC solution: $1000 credit to learn how to become a Reiki Master....Required for all citizens and new immigrants.

    Heal yourself and others!

  • Jacob Caldwell, LMP
    Posted by Jacob Caldwell, LMP, Seattle (Capitol Hill), Washington | Oct 18, 2009

    UHC solution 2: Make food healthy! Stop making it so it can survive a nuclear bomb and stop making sure the right dye is in the food to make it look good. Make sure it is healthy first...this is what is killing us. Unhealthy food and stress is causing our diseases.

  • Lizette Ayala
    Posted by Lizette Ayala, Fairfax, Virginia | Oct 18, 2009

    I agree Jacob. I'd like to see the government do more to educate the public about alternative and complementary health care.

    They can certainly learn a lot about marketing and sales from big pharma.

  • Jacob Caldwell, LMP
    Posted by Jacob Caldwell, LMP, Seattle (Capitol Hill), Washington | Oct 19, 2009

    This is my whole point, why give the government control over our health. The options should be in our hands not theirs.

  • Ari Klein
    Posted by Ari Klein, Seattle, Washington | Oct 19, 2009

    We have two conversations here: 1.Public Health Education and 2.Making health care available through a public plan that directly competes with big insurance; and its impact on complementary services.

    To Lizette's point, Brava! Yes, using marketing techniques to educate kids early on delicious proper nutrition will go a long way. Use the same techniques that big processed food companies use to get their attention. Education on safety to the whole population is another worthy cause that should be supported by the government. Canada currently has an education campaign to help cut fatalities do to accidental deaths (a large percent of all their fatalities). It is in inferred that money saved on accidental deaths can be pumped back in to provide more services in their public program.

    This leads us to insurance. The reality is that many people cannot afford health care at all. Care is post phoned until acute, harder to treat and costly, as well as overwhelming our ERs. Public insurance can be used to make for profit insurance companies really compete and at the same time provide for those who can't afford care. As for the "take care of me crowd", many of these people are on, and will stay on, company or private plans that will be continue to have more inclusive coverage that will be costlier than public plans.

    Complementary care cuts total medical cost in a way that single provider care cannot. I cannot speak for other modalities but the addition of hypnotherapy cuts healing time, and saves costs on both the patient and medical organization and insurance sides (e.g. cost studies include its use to support the treatment of IBS, asthma, breast cancer). It's time to drop the term 'alternative' from our jargon as it infers 'either or'; and to embrace the term and reality of 'complementary' care.

    For people who have money, care is always in their hands as they can pay directly for services. For those without means a government plan gives them access to coverage and care. More care than they have now.

  • Jacob Caldwell, LMP
    Posted by Jacob Caldwell, LMP, Seattle (Capitol Hill), Washington | Oct 19, 2009

    Can lower insurance rates and increase competition if government lifted the ban on Insurance companies to cross state lines.

Members posting in this topic

Post tags

  • universal health care complementary alternative modalities beneifits opinion