Barbara... Just wanting to be clear about MY opinion.
Concerning your statement: "And our constitution does say that government exists to provide for the general welfare for its people - which I think does include access to basic health care."
The Constitution says: "...PROMOTE the general welfare..." not PROVIDE. And, I agree that means "access to basic health care", but not funding it.
In my personal experience, I have witnessed two people who made the mistake of choosing to break the law, but otherwise were good people, DIE because of lack of access to basic health care.
They otherwise could have had access but were denied that privilege because they were classified by society as a threat necessary to be incarcerated. For every public example of an inmate receiving "preferential" treatment, there are numerous examples of government malfeasance in providing access to basic health care.
Let's not get into any movement of change IF it starts classifying people as WHO is deserving and WHO is not.
As business people (solo or otherwise) we make the choice as to what business expenses we deem necessary to operation and the setting of our fees to provide our services, just as large corporations can decide if the health benefit expense fits into the price-value of their services.
Let the market determine the price of health care services without over-regulation and let the insurance companies compete for those who do not want to take the chance of personal responsibility, and let the religious and charitable organizations fill in the gap to care for those in need regardless of the reason.
I agree with you that there are alternative methods to take care of ourselves. I think the government needs to let us keep our own money and decide where we want to spend it.
And I ultimately believe that the competition of alternative sources would provide better and more for less. ...Howard