hmmmm.
In your stating that something is "completely wrong" do I sense that maybe how you perceive and how I perceive are different. In reading your post, I see that your personal history has associated those words in ways that keep you from seeing a truth with a small "t" that I perceive. I use the mind and body because they are the most intimate forms available to each individual representing the most fundamental concepts in the universe and their integrity is complete. In understanding how they operate and relate in a deductive way is different that an inductive way, and is non-lingual in nature and therefore to spend time with it anywhere outside of introspection is simply begging for discourse, so I will leave that alone.
"Terms like top-down, bottom-up, and transparency do not address the facts, and are not part of any solution for this particular aspect of the problem. Those ideals are all important for establishing laws against force, such as laws against murder, slavery, and theft, and for deciding the punishment for violations. But those principles are useless when it comes to the economy."
In how you have just applied them, I would agree, but that is simply due to how you relate to how they are used and not to how I intended them. I sense that you may wind up getting lost in the fractal nature of exponentially increasing information if you do not know how to disengage with the form something takes to see the generic principle in which it came from.
It seems that your desire to find a deposit only banking system that all banks should be modeled after (if that is your position) would be your mattress. I don't see how we could establish credit, free capital, and have an efficient system with this model. If I'm not mistaking Europe had a very similar model for which they longed to be in the US because with the freeing of capitol comes the freeing of individual choice.
I also don't know much about credit unions, but the principles as I understand are that the wealth/debt remains in the community so that there is a much greater commitment to the local community. To me the wealth and debt need to be created and held in the same arena and not wealth for some private interests with debt for those not in their circle.