Kare, thank you so much for sharing these concepts on Biznik. Now I'm engaged:) I'll get right to The Point.
I have a pretty sinister view right now on federally allocated funding:
-social/economic development funding overseas routinely ends up in the bank accounts of a handful of very data driven US consulting firms that are contracted for the work
-social/economic development funding domestically is heavily absorbed by state and local agencies administering the funds and attending to regulations tied to it, such that a fraction of it ends reaching the intended communities
So I guess, for lack of a better solution, I'd prefer the source of more funding opportunities come from socially compassionate high net worth individuals (or groups of them). I'll resist the temptation to name names. Although they often lack the insider's experience and knowledge of best practices in the areas they fund, I feel they're truly invested in making their dollars go where they're intended to go as efficiently and effectively as possible.
And now for my two bits on "data driven results"...This craze has been around for at least the past 8 years (as long as I've been training and working in this field). It's amazing how data can be used to mask and impress, just like any statistic. Although I'm completely in favor of trying to measure whatever is measurable, I've found that forcing nonprofits and other grantees to compete on that basis leaves many high impact social initiatives out in the cold. There are so many valuable quality-of-life outcomes that cannot be measured quantitatively.
...OK, now I'll shut up and go peruse The Point (as if I have spare time).